[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?
From: |
Unkargherth |
Subject: |
RE: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial? |
Date: |
Wed, 17 May 2000 01:49:08 +0200 |
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden nombre de
> Dave O'Toole
> Enviado el: domingo 14 de mayo de 2000 5:18
> Para: address@hidden
> Asunto: Re: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?
>
>
> > anybody thinks it would make sense to develop a "gearlib" for octal
> > to hold all the low-level dsp routines common to many octal
> machines.
In my opinion it's acool idea, it's neede, and it's neede now,in order to
standarize things
I think that standard oscilators and filters, ADSR/Envelopes inertia and
interpolation would be the first targets to begin with
Unkargherth (address@hidden)
http://www.unkargherth.f2s.com
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, (continued)
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Daniel, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Edward Coffey, 2000/05/17
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Davíð B Fanzson, 2000/05/17
- [Octal-dev] possibly irrelevant idea, Ross Litscher, 2000/05/14
- Re: [Octal-dev] possibly irrelevant idea, Gary Richardson, 2000/05/14
- Re: [Octal-dev] possibly irrelevant idea, Dave O'Toole, 2000/05/14
- RE: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?,
Unkargherth <=
- Re: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?, joost diepenmaat, 2000/05/17
- OT: Re: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?, Matt Stanton, 2000/05/17
- Re: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/17
- Re: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?, David O'Toole, 2000/05/17