[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #50014] Octave segmentation violation when duplicate nested functions exist

[Rik]

Follow-up Comment #8, bug #50014 (project octave):

The new patch works just fine for the original nested function example, and
fixes the regression introduced around an ordinary parser error.  However, it
still fails testbug2.m in comment #3.

The issue is that while duplicate nested functions and duplicate subfunctions
are detected, any nested function or subfunction can still duplicate the
primary function name.

For ease, I've uploaded testbug.m, testbug2.m, testbug3.m, testbug4.m which
all test a different combination.  See the comment line at the top of each.


(file #39460, file #39461, file #39462, file #39463)
    _______________________________________________________

Additional Item Attachment:

File name: testbug.m                      Size:0 KB
File name: testbug3.m                     Size:0 KB
File name: testbug2.m                     Size:0 KB
File name: testbug4.m                     Size:0 KB


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?50014>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/