[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #48793] no need for OCTAVE_LOCAL_BUFFER anymore

[John W. Eaton]

Follow-up Comment #10, bug #48793 (project octave):

Thanks for looking at this.  I suspect the difference in performance could be
that getting a pointer from the chunk_buffer is a lot faster than calling new
to allocate memory.  But I'm not sure it's worth the extra complexity.  It's
good to see a reduction of around 300 lines without really losing anything.

Did you mean to leave the "assert (0)" in the version of the
OCTAVE_LOCAL_BUFFER macro that is supposed to be used with C++14 and later? 
For consistency, it should probably also not end with a semicolon.


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?48793>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/