octave-bug-tracker
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #42037] Missing function integral


From: Rik
Subject: [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #42037] Missing function integral
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:13:15 -0400 (EDT)
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:55.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/55.0

Follow-up Comment #24, bug #42037 (project octave):

I think so.  Not only is quadcc faster than quadgk, because it is a compiled
function rather than an m-file, but it can readily handle non-smooth
integrands with weird discontinuities including NaNs.  If a user knows
something about the specifics of the integrand, such as it being smooth and
continuous, then they can choose the integrator that best suits the problem. 
But if you don't know anything about it, and only have a handle to the
function, you need an integrator that can handle strange behavior.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?42037>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]