[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53005] Variable editor: slow performance with
From: |
Dan Sebald |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53005] Variable editor: slow performance with large arrays |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:44:35 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:55.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/55.0 |
Follow-up Comment #11, bug #53005 (project octave):
Limiting the size is fine, but I think the better alternative is to make the
feature user-driven, not automatic auto-fit. I can see how what I'm saying
about "auto auto" is somewhat obscure. Imagine there is a button in the
header of the V.E. The user presses the button and Autofit does its job. (Or
if a button isn't preferred, make the action a right-mouse-click which creates
a local drop down menu of which "autofit" can be selected.)
The Autofit feature shouldn't run again and again with each processing
command. I find that kind of annoying if I first manually slide the column
widths to what I like, run a command and then Octave shrinks all those column
widths again. If I have my table view as desired, run a command, then the
table is showing a different collection of columns because of the resize I
have to go searching for the columns that were in view previously.
But I can see the usefulness of what I described in the first paragraph, i.e.,
that as a user I look at the V.E. table and decide it doesn't look correct so
I manually initiate an Autofit. If I happen to have 1000x1000 array and that
takes 8 seconds, fine. It's just once and until I press the Autofit button
again, there is no apparent lag in processing even though the V.E. is updating
the contents of the cells.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?53005>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53005] Variable editor: slow performance with large arrays, (continued)
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53005] Variable editor: slow performance with large arrays, Rik, 2018/01/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53005] Variable editor: slow performance with large arrays, John W. Eaton, 2018/01/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53005] Variable editor: slow performance with large arrays, Dan Sebald, 2018/01/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53005] Variable editor: slow performance with large arrays, John W. Eaton, 2018/01/30
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53005] Variable editor: slow performance with large arrays, Dan Sebald, 2018/01/30
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53005] Variable editor: slow performance with large arrays, John W. Eaton, 2018/01/30
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53005] Variable editor: slow performance with large arrays, Dan Sebald, 2018/01/30
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53005] Variable editor: slow performance with large arrays, Dan Sebald, 2018/01/30
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53005] Variable editor: slow performance with large arrays, Dan Sebald, 2018/01/30
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53005] Variable editor: slow performance with large arrays, Philip Nienhuis, 2018/01/31
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53005] Variable editor: slow performance with large arrays,
Dan Sebald <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53005] Variable editor: slow performance with large arrays, Rik, 2018/01/31
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53005] Variable editor: slow performance with large arrays, Philip Nienhuis, 2018/01/31
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53005] Variable editor: slow performance with large arrays, Dan Sebald, 2018/01/31
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #53005] Variable editor: slow performance with large arrays, Rik, 2018/01/31