[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #54698] Precedence of call/indexing operator over transpose operator

[Mike Miller]

Follow-up Comment #7, bug #54698 (project octave):

I agree with Michael, in that we should proceed under the assumption that the
current behavior is correct and the documentation just needs to be updated. I
also agree with Michael that all the verbiage about operator collapsing and
virtual operators is way too complex.

I think it would be enough to rearrange the operator precedence table to make
it clear that the unary transpose operators have the same precedence as the
parentheses and bracket operators, and associate from left to right. Is
anything more than that needed?

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?54698>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/