[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Add min/max tests. (4/4)
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Add min/max tests. (4/4) |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 18:09:14 -0500 (CDT) |
On 13-Sep-2000, Edward Jason Riedy <address@hidden> wrote:
| And "John W. Eaton" writes:
| -
| - So, I think what is really needed is some way to tell the min and
| - max funtions what comparison operation (or function) to use.
|
| Sorry for the long delay. This is the right thing, but it's
| terribly painful in a Matlab-like language. And if you're
| not tied to a Matlab-like language, why not use Python? ;)
Why Python in particular and not some other scripting language? This
is a serious question. I am not interested in starting a language
war. But if I didn't want Matlab (or Octave), why would I choose
Python?
jwe
- [PATCH] Add min/max tests. (4/4), Edward Jason Riedy, 2000/09/04
- [PATCH] Add min/max tests. (4/4), John W. Eaton, 2000/09/04
- Re: [PATCH] Add min/max tests. (4/4), Edward Jason Riedy, 2000/09/04
- Re: [PATCH] Add min/max tests. (4/4), John W. Eaton, 2000/09/05
- Re: [PATCH] Add min/max tests. (4/4), John W. Eaton, 2000/09/06
- Re: [PATCH] Add min/max tests. (4/4), Edward Jason Riedy, 2000/09/13
- Re: [PATCH] Add min/max tests. (4/4),
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: [PATCH] Add min/max tests. (4/4), Edward Jason Riedy, 2000/09/13
- Python (was: Re: [PATCH] Add min/max tests. (4/4)), John W. Eaton, 2000/09/13
- Re: Python (was: Re: [PATCH] Add min/max tests. (4/4)), Edward Jason Riedy, 2000/09/14