[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ISO C++ and Octave
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: ISO C++ and Octave |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:22:36 -0600 |
On 31-Jan-2001, Mumit Khan <address@hidden> wrote:
| On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, John W. Eaton wrote:
|
| > This seems to be a change in the way gcc works. Do you know the
| > reason for the change? I see that with gcc 2.97, I can specify the
| > targets with -MT "..." but that doesn't work with earlier versions of
| > gcc.
|
| I had missed the -MT option, thanks for pointing it out. Yet another
| little thing that configure has to do.
But why the change? This seems like something that is going to cause
trouble for a lot of packages.
jwe
- ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/30
- ISO C++ and Octave, John W. Eaton, 2001/01/30
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/30
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, John W. Eaton, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, John W. Eaton, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, John W. Eaton, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, John W. Eaton, 2001/01/31
- Patch [Re: ISO C++ and Octave], Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
- Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/31
Re: ISO C++ and Octave, Mumit Khan, 2001/01/30