[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: google groups and Usenet
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: google groups and Usenet |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Sep 2005 13:57:55 -0400 |
On 9-Sep-2005, Shai Ayal wrote:
| Can you please elaborate on the amount and type of work required ?
Here is how the lists currently work:
* Handled by Smartlist (built on procmail). Might be better to use
MailMan so that we could have a web interface. Some people have
requested this, but I have no time to set it up. If someone were
to take over the job of managing the mailing lists, this would
probably be something they could do.
* To post, you must be a subscriber. This cuts out most but not all
spam (sometimes we see spam that appears to come from subscribers
but is really just spam with faked From: lines).
* Postings that come from people not subscribed to the lists are
bounced to the moderator (currently just me, but would be better
to share this job among several people so that vacations don't
disrupt the mail from non-subscribers). I generally bounce
messages from non-subscribers to the lists, but will sometimes ask
people who are posting frequently to subscribe, or I sometimes add
them to the secondary accept list so their messages will be
accepted even if they are not subscribed. I don't know how you
would manage this part if postings can come from usenet.
* Spam filtering is also done on the lists using spamassassin.
* Archiving and updating the HTML indices is done as the messages
come in using some home-brew scripts. These could probably be
replaced by something more standard and better, but I don't have
the time to investigate or implement.
* Indexing (currently using glimpse, but there must be a better
solution as the code I am using is no longer part of Debian).
* The mailing list management and archiving must be performed with
free software. We can't afford to be locked in to some
proprietary solution that might not be available to us in the
future.
* It is important that bug reports sent to address@hidden are never
dropped, whether they come from a subscriber or not.
jwe