Re: Depreciated Functions

[Bill Denney]

On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, John W. Eaton wrote:

> Yes, I think Octave should avoid using the deprecated functions 
> internally.

I was looking through the other depreciated functions, and one that is not 
depreciated, but that does not fit with the naming of other functions is 
stdnormal_* (* = cdf, inv, pdf, rnd).  Would you like to change the naming 
to stdnorm* instead and move the stdnormal_* versions to depreciated?

Also, can someone explain what the difference between a standard normal 
and just a normal distribution are (it may be good to update the docs for 
that)?

Bill

--
"Nothing is more terrible than ignorance in action."
  -- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe