octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: structure discussion


From: Andy Adler
Subject: RE: structure discussion
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:30:58 -0400 (EDT)

On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, Paul Billings wrote:

> Perhaps a more concise example: with version 2.1.71,
>    clear g; g(1).a = g(2).a = 1;
>    g(:).a = 2;  % does what you'd expect (both .a values are changed)
>    g(:).b = 1   % does NOT do what I would expect

FYI, Here is what the competition gives:

>> clear g; g(1).a =1; g(2).a = 1;
>> g(:).a = 2;  % does what you'd expect (both .a values are changed)
??? Insufficient outputs from right hand side to satisfy comma separated
list expansion on left hand side.  Missing [] are the most likely cause.

>> g(:).b = 1   % does NOT do what I would expect
??? Insufficient outputs from right hand side to satisfy comma separated
list expansion on left hand side.  Missing [] are the most likely cause.

--
Andy Adler <address@hidden> 1(613)562-5800x6218





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]