On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 10:35:03PM -0400, Paul Kienzle wrote:
The main reason I can see for doing so is that it will make it easier
for John to move functions and packages in and out of the core without
losing the change history.
This will make more work for the server administrator though.
I would enjoy having all of Octave on one SVN server (mostly because I
would much prefer SVN on both Octave and Octave Forge).
Administering subversion is really not difficult or time-consuming, as
I saw again while setting up the example server.
Send Andy your public keys (ssh-keygen, without passwords) in order to
receive access to the server. Please try it out and tell us about
anything that might hinder the adoption of this improved revision
control system.