[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: First version of MinGW octave
|
From: |
John W. Eaton |
|
Subject: |
Re: First version of MinGW octave |
|
Date: |
Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:46:33 -0500 |
On 15-Feb-2006, Shai Ayal wrote:
| Can sockets and fork be implemented in mingw or do I have to write a
| nigw specific version to handle this using windows calls?
Umm, isn't that what Cygwin provides? I don't see the point of
reinvinting the "missing" parts of Cygwin for MinGW.
jwe
- First version of MinGW octave, David Bateman, 2006/02/14
- Re: First version of MinGW octave, David Bateman, 2006/02/14
- Re: First version of MinGW octave, Sebastien Loisel, 2006/02/14
- Re: First version of MinGW octave, Shai Ayal, 2006/02/14
- Re: First version of MinGW octave, David Bateman, 2006/02/15
- Re: First version of MinGW octave,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: First version of MinGW octave, Shai Ayal, 2006/02/15
- Re: First version of MinGW octave, John W. Eaton, 2006/02/15
- Re: First version of MinGW octave, John Swensen, 2006/02/15
- Re: First version of MinGW octave, Paul Kienzle, 2006/02/15
- Re: First version of MinGW octave, Shai Ayal, 2006/02/15
- Re: First version of MinGW octave, Paul Kienzle, 2006/02/16
- Re: First version of MinGW octave, Paul Kienzle, 2006/02/15
- Message not available
- Re: First version of MinGW octave, David Bateman, 2006/02/15
- Re: First version of MinGW octave, John W. Eaton, 2006/02/15
- Re: First version of MinGW octave, Paul Kienzle, 2006/02/15