fail.m ?

[John W. Eaton]

On 15-Mar-2006, David Bateman wrote:

| Any reason that fail.m was removed from scripts/testfun?

A message from Paul Kienzle said that it was no longer needed.  I sent
a note to you and Paul about this yesterday, in a message with the
subject "regexp and tests":

  | 1. 'fail' has been superceded by 'error' and 'warning' blocks.
  | No need to include it.

  OK, I removed it.

| Its removal
| causes about 20 odd test to fail with "make check". In many cases you
| can replace these failing tests with "%!error" but I have found that
| some cases require
| 
| %!test
| %! ...
| %! fail(...)
| 
| and so it would be better to keep it in my opinion...

OK, if you think it should come back from the dead, I can arrange
that.

jwe