Re: 2.9.5 and 2.1.73

[Rafael Laboissiere]

* John W. Eaton <address@hidden> [2006-03-16 13:12]:

> On 16-Mar-2006, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> 
> | >   50_octave-value-list-resize-2.9.dpatch
> | > 
> | > I don't plan to make this change since I think we determined that the
> | > problem was due to a compiler bug, and I think that has since been
> | > fixed.
> | 
> | This one is already applied to CVS HEAD.
> 
> Hmm.  Now I'm confused.  The patch appears to move the body of the
> function
> 
>   void octave_value_list::resize (octave_idx_type n, const octave_value& val)
> 
> from the oct-obj.cc to oct-obj.h, but in my current CVS sources, the
> body of the function is in oct-obj.cc file, so it seems the patch has
> not been applied.

FWIW, you posted this patch in:

    http://www.octave.org/mailing-lists/help-octave/2005/4266

> I think you mean that 50_octave-value-list-resize-2.1 is the one
> related to the compiler bug and the other two are not included yet.

Yes, sorry for the mess.

> OK, I'll just update the .el files in the 2.1.x branch to be the same
> as the ones in the 2.9.x branch.

Thanks.

-- 
Rafael