[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Jump from 2.1.65 to 2.9.5
From: |
Bill Denney |
Subject: |
Re: Jump from 2.1.65 to 2.9.5 |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Apr 2006 23:25:19 -0400 (EDT) |
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
I've upgraded from 2.1.65 to 2.9.5 and notice a couple things so far:
1) What I used to use in 2.1.65 is:
[output,status] = system([gnuplot_binary " --version"]);
and I've had to switch that to:
[status,output] = system([gnuplot_binary " --version"]);
in 2.9.5. The documentation still reads:
[...]
This is a documentation bug. The system function was changed for
compatibility.
2) In something like sprintf('e\n') the '\n' is interpretted correctly.
However, in __gnuplot_raw('e\n') the escape character is treated as '\' and
'n'. (I assume it was desired to behave that way.)
Strings are now interpreted differently depending on the quotes used.
Single quotes (') work as in matlab with no interpretation of the string,
and double quotes (") use backslash escaping. You are probably looking
for the double quote.
Bill
--
"For I am Xander, king of cretins. May all other cretins bow before
me."
-- Xander, Buffy the Vampire Slayer 1x03
- Jump from 2.1.65 to 2.9.5, Daniel J Sebald, 2006/04/15
- Re: Jump from 2.1.65 to 2.9.5,
Bill Denney <=
- Re: Jump from 2.1.65 to 2.9.5, Daniel J Sebald, 2006/04/16
- Re: Jump from 2.1.65 to 2.9.5, Bill Denney, 2006/04/16
- Re: Jump from 2.1.65 to 2.9.5, Søren Hauberg, 2006/04/16
- Re: Jump from 2.1.65 to 2.9.5, Daniel J Sebald, 2006/04/16
- Re: Jump from 2.1.65 to 2.9.5, John W. Eaton, 2006/04/16
- Re: Jump from 2.1.65 to 2.9.5, Daniel J Sebald, 2006/04/16
- Re: Jump from 2.1.65 to 2.9.5, Rafael Laboissiere, 2006/04/22