[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Sep 2006 23:33:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060817) |
John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 12-Sep-2006, David Bateman wrote:
>
> | David Bateman wrote:
> | > Sorry I had no network connection last night so couldn't send this. Here
> | > is an updated patch, based on the changes discussed. You might prefer
> | > the mark Flasterr extern in error.h rather than in cellfun.cc.
> | >
> | > D.
> | >
> | >
> | John,
> |
> | Can I commit the changes to cellfun.cc there were attached to my
> | previous message in this thread?
>
> Sorry for the delay. Yes, please go ahead and commit it and the
> changes to pkg.m
>
> Thanks,
>
> jwe
>
Ok done. I've also fixed the pkg('list') command so that the header is
sized to the output, and sorted the packages in the list, so it is
easier to find if a particular package is installed.
D.
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, (continued)
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, John W. Eaton, 2006/09/01
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, David Bateman, 2006/09/01
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, David Bateman, 2006/09/03
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, John W. Eaton, 2006/09/05
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, David Bateman, 2006/09/06
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, John W. Eaton, 2006/09/06
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, David Bateman, 2006/09/06
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, David Bateman, 2006/09/07
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, David Bateman, 2006/09/12
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays, John W. Eaton, 2006/09/12
- Re: mapper functions vs. cell arrays,
David Bateman <=