Re: Compiling octave with MSVC

[Michael Goffioul]

John W. Eaton a écrit :
> On 10-Oct-2006, Michael Goffioul wrote:
>
> | #define NDS_CMP_OP2(F, OP, ND, NDC, S, SC, SPEC1, SPEC2) \
> |   boolNDArray \
> |   F (const ND& m, const S& s) \
> |   { \
> |     boolNDArray r; \
> |  \
> |     int len = m.length (); \
> |  \
> |     r.resize (m.dims ()); \
> |  \
> |     for (int i = 0; i < len; i++) \
> |       r.elem(i) = operator OP <SPEC1,SPEC2> (NDC (m.elem(i)), SC (s)); \
> |  \
> |     return r; \
> |   }
>
> Another thought.  If SPEC1 and SPEC2 are the types of the operands to
> OP, then does it work to write
>
>   operator OP <typeof(m.elem(i)), typeof(s)> (NDC (m.elem(i)), SC (s));
>
> instead?  If so, then I think we can avoid changing the interface of
> the macro.
>   
I don't think so because 's' is of type octave_int<T> and you need 'T' 
for SPEC2. However, I
think another solution is to use:

        NDC (m.elem(i)) OP SC (s.value())

but then you don't use templates for OP, because s.value() is not a 
template type. So you really
change the code executed.

Michael.