[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pre-compiled octave for Windows
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: Pre-compiled octave for Windows |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Dec 2006 07:51:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060921) |
Michael Goffioul wrote:
>
> There is only one version of the DLL's, isn't it? Concerning
> octinterp.dll in bin/ dir and a different
> one in lib/ dir, I don't understand what you mean. The .lib and .dll
> files are coupled: the .lib file
> defines the symbols that are found in the .dll and is used at link time.
> So you need both of them
> (actually, the .lib files are only installed if you selected the
> "Development" package in the installer).
Ok, I'm not an expert on windows and missed this..
> Maybe it's simply due to NSIS, which forces you to explicitely accept
> the license
> when you define one in the NSI script (I didn't check yet). What is better:
> not showing any license page at installation, or showing a license when
> an accept button,
> even it doesn't really make sense?
Ask John what he prefers...
Regards
David
- Re: Pre-compiled octave for Windows, (continued)
RE: Pre-compiled octave for Windows, michael . goffioul, 2006/12/15
RE: Re: Pre-compiled octave for Windows, michael . goffioul, 2006/12/19