[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.9.11?
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: 2.9.11? |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:53:23 -0400 |
On 19-Apr-2007, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
| So, I'm left inconclusive wondering if the compilation and library usage
matches
| ultimately what Octave compilation is set up as.
|
| Grasping at straws, but is there any possible way that Octave could be
calling
| csqrt(complex value) for, say sqrt(-3), whereas it is calling sqrt(real
value)
| for sqrt(-Inf)? The latter would be a floating point exception and maybe
that
| isn't handled properly?
That doesn't seem to be what happens on my system with GCC 4.1.2.
I'd recommend running Octave with gdb and setting a breakpoint in
octave_mapper::apply (const octave_value& arg) const
(defined in src/ov-mapper.cc) and seeing what happens on your system.
jwe
- Re: 2.9.11?, (continued)
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/19
- sqrt(-Inf) (was Re: 2.9.11?), Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/19
- Re: 2.9.11?,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/20
- Re: 2.9.11?, John W. Eaton, 2007/04/20
- Re: 2.9.11?, Daniel J Sebald, 2007/04/20