[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octave and Single Precision
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: Octave and Single Precision |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:26:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060921) |
Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> A recent exchange on the octave help list:
>
> Hmm, I don't see any problem. I put the following in a file named test.m
>
> Thank you for your help. I tried many times but the error is still there.
>
> Of course the problem was because they used different versions of the
> routine, but they didn't have a way to find out which version they were
> using. This got me thinking about versioning. In RPM/YUM, one of my
> favorite things is that you can find out the provenience of everything,
> including versions etc: rpm -qf `which gfortran`
>
> I understand that octave packages will map one-to-one to platform
> packages, right? Would it then make sense to have 'pkg info' command
> that would list component files and versions and dates? if so, does
> it make sense to rely on the platform packaging system for this info,
> or does it have to be separately maintained?
>
>
> p
>
>
>
"pkg list" already lists the version numbers. If you have "nargout > 0",
the returned structure also includes the release dates of the packages..
D.
--
David Bateman address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph)
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob)
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax)
The information contained in this communication has been classified as:
[x] General Business Information
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary