Re: Couple comments about image_viewer and path behavior

[Søren Hauberg]

Quentin Spencer skrev:
> Søren Hauberg wrote:
> > By the way, this isn't matlab compatible as matlab search for image 
> > files in the path that is modified through addpath. So, before we 
> > start documenting IMAGE_PATH, perhaps we should change it to simply 
> > use the standard path?
>
> I have always wondered why we had a separate path for images. I'm all 
> for getting rid of it.
I can see why we might want to have a DATA_PATH that would affect where 
images, audio data, .mat files, etc, would be found. But I agree that a 
path that's only for images isn't that useful.

Søren