Re: Metis

[David Bateman]

John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 17-Oct-2007, David Bateman wrote:
>
> | Opps yeah I forgot about that bit of code.. In fact its the same bit of
> | code everywhere and is just block of code that forces versions of metis
> | later than 4.0.2 to use a particular implementation of malloc and free
> | and to test for out-of-memory conditions before calling metis if that
> | can't be done. The free/malloc bits can be dropped and in later versions
> | of CHOLMOD the memory guard code is the default.. So if we don't want to
> | set the free/malloc functions for metis, this is just cruft and can be
> | completely removed.
>
> OK, I removed all bits of code inside the #ifdef HAVE_METIS blocks.
> Also, I eliminated the check for Metis in the configure script.  This
> doesn't prevent you from defining lib and include flags to get it if
> that's what you want, but now Octave won't look for it.
>   
Fine with me.. I tend not to use Metis in any case....

D.

-- 
David Bateman                                address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris                        +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) 
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin    +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) 
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE                  +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) 

The information contained in this communication has been classified as: 

[x] General Business Information 
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only 
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary