[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Redirectable octave?
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: Redirectable octave? |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:15:14 -0400 |
On 18-Oct-2007, Michael Goffioul wrote:
| On 10/18/07, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
| > | Here's a proposal for the standard IO interface that could be used in
| > | octave. The idea is then to add 3 FILE* arguments to octave_main and
| > | to call octave_standard_streams::init with those 3 args. In the normal
| > | case, you end up using std::cin/cout/cerr.
| >
| > OK, I think this looks good.
|
| OK. I'll continue this way and come with a full patch later. Just a small
| question: would this API go into an existing header or would you prefer
| a separate one?
I'd say define these symbols in a separate header.
Also, should we consider renaming octave_stdout (the one that normally
goes through the pager) to avoid confusion?
jwe
- Redirectable octave?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/10/15
- Re: Redirectable octave?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/10/16
- Re: Redirectable octave?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/16
- Re: Redirectable octave?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/10/17
- Re: Redirectable octave?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/17
- Re: Redirectable octave?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/10/18
- Re: Redirectable octave?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/10/18
- Re: Redirectable octave?, John W. Eaton, 2007/10/18
- Re: Redirectable octave?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/10/18
- Re: Redirectable octave?,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: Redirectable octave?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/10/18
- Re: Redirectable octave?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/10/18