[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mapper functions for 3.1
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: mapper functions for 3.1 |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:11:22 -0500 |
On 17-Feb-2008, David Bateman wrote:
| John W. Eaton wrote:
| > On 16-Feb-2008, John W. Eaton wrote:
| >
| > | There might be a slick way to combine the functor
| > | and functor_with_conversion classes using default template parameters
| > | but I don't see it at the moment.
| >
| > OK, here is one way. Define the functor class like this:
|
|
| Not sure I'll have time to look at this in the next few days, so feel
| free to do this change if I don't get there.
OK, I will try to work on this later today or tomorrow.
| Perhaps the recently exception handler
| change is a bad idea for cygwin,
I would guess there is some negative performance impact.
| but as we have mingw and msvc builds
| now do we care in any case..
Given that we can build Octave on Windows systems without Cygwin, I
don't think we should let the bad state of GCC on Cygwin dictate
design of Octave internals.
jwe
- Re: mapper functions for 3.1, (continued)
- Re: mapper functions for 3.1, David Bateman, 2008/02/15
- Re: mapper functions for 3.1, John W. Eaton, 2008/02/16
- Re: mapper functions for 3.1, David Bateman, 2008/02/16
- Re: mapper functions for 3.1, John W. Eaton, 2008/02/16
- Re: mapper functions for 3.1, John W. Eaton, 2008/02/16
- Re: mapper functions for 3.1, David Bateman, 2008/02/17
- Re: mapper functions for 3.1,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: mapper functions for 3.1, John W. Eaton, 2008/02/20