[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS build error with new sort
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: CVS build error with new sort |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:00:59 -0400 |
On 2-Apr-2008, Thomas Treichl wrote:
| Some time has been passed on this thread but the problem still follows me on
| MacOSX. You have been right with std::streamoff==long long int. I also tried
to
| use several variations of -weak options for the linker but has not been
successful.
|
| So I gave it a try to write a configure test for it. Can somebody please have
a
| look at it and tell me if this would be the right way to do it (can the
| AC_CHECK_TYPES for std::streamoff be neglected)? If so then I can prepare a
| changeset for the current sources the following days. My idea was then to
change
|
| liboctave/Array-i.cc:#if defined (HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT)
|
| into
|
| liboctave/Array-i.cc:#if defined (HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT) &&
| !defined (HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_STREAMOFF)
I think we need to check whether streamoff is actually a typedef for
"long long int", not just that it has the same size. For example, if
it is a class that happens to have the same size, I think we would
need to instantiate arrays of streamoff objects separately from Arrays
of "long long int" objects.
jwe