Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?)

[David Bateman]

John W. Eaton wrote:
> On  3-Apr-2008, David Bateman wrote:
>
> | We still need to add the same warning
> | messages to the existing deprecated functions.
>
> Would you like for me to do that?
>   
The reason I didn't do it, is that its nearly 90 files that need
altering, and the alteration is different for each file, and there might
even be some odd cases like gamma_*.m where the sense of the arguments
changed as the help text might need to be adjusted to reflect that. Its
therefore not easy to write a script to automate the inclusion of the
warning. I'll try to do something, but it might take a while.

> I added a comment to all the files in the directory to indicate in
> which version the function was moved to the deprecated directory.  I
> used 3.0 for all functions except the ones you just created.  For
> those I used 3.1.  So if you decide to add the warnings, please update
> first to avoid potential conflicts.
>   
Ok, I pulled in your changes.

D.


-- 
David Bateman                                address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris                        +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) 
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin    +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) 
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE                  +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) 

The information contained in this communication has been classified as: 

[x] General Business Information 
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only 
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary