[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reducing memory by emulating IDL's temporary() function
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: Reducing memory by emulating IDL's temporary() function |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Apr 2008 02:17:46 -0400 |
On 25-Apr-2008, Judd Storrs wrote:
| On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Jaroslav Hajek <address@hidden> wrote:
|
| > 1. there can be an explicit means of "give a value and deallocate".
| > Instead of creating a stand-alone `temporary', however, I suggest
| > extending `clear' to return the cleared value when called with nargout
| > = 1.
| >
|
| One challenge of changing clear like this is that the function form of clear
| requires a string argument.
The "command" form of clear is also passing a character string
argument to the internal "clear" function. The difference is just in
the way the command/function is parsed.
| The demonstration code I posted also requires a
| string also but I considered that a bug in my implementation.
Why? Clear works on variable names in the symbol table, not on
values.
jwe
- Reducing memory by emulating IDL's temporary() function, Judd Storrs, 2008/04/24
- Reducing memory by emulating IDL's temporary() function, John W. Eaton, 2008/04/24
- Message not available
- Re: Reducing memory by emulating IDL's temporary() function, Judd Storrs, 2008/04/24
- Re: Reducing memory by emulating IDL's temporary() function, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/04/25
- Re: Reducing memory by emulating IDL's temporary() function, Judd Storrs, 2008/04/25
- Re: Reducing memory by emulating IDL's temporary() function,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: Reducing memory by emulating IDL's temporary() function, Judd Storrs, 2008/04/29
- Re: Reducing memory by emulating IDL's temporary() function, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/04/29