[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Octave" namespace for Octave C++ sources for 3.2?
From: |
Michael Goffioul |
Subject: |
Re: "Octave" namespace for Octave C++ sources for 3.2? |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Aug 2008 23:11:46 +0200 |
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 10:51 PM, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> | When wrapping into an octave namespace, would you end up (for instance)
> | with octave::octave_value or with octave::value? More generally, do you
> | intend to keep the octave_ prefix?.
>
> I'd like to eliminate some of them. I'm not sure we have to remove
> all of them. Even if we do remove some, I think we could use typedefs
> to keep the old names around, at least for some time (years, probably).
I'm just asking because I was thinking about the graphics code and
the possibility to remove some graphics_ prefixes as well. For instance,
turn graphics_backend class into octave::graphics::backend.
Michael.