octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Changeset]: Re: cla() ?


From: Ben Abbott
Subject: Re: [Changeset]: Re: cla() ?
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:44:45 -0400


On Oct 6, 2008, at 5:32 AM, David Bateman wrote:

Ben Abbott wrote:

There's a few functions, that rely upon the current ishandle() behavior, which will need to be changed as well.

Once ishandle works correctly I'll submit change sets for those I've found.

So far my list includes __plt_get_axis_arg__.m, axes.m, hold.m, and orient.m.

Ok, I suppose you mean that ishandle('ij') should return "false(1,2)", and that the code needs to be adapted to handle that. If you want to make these changes then I'll let you do it.. I suggest the updated changeset attached to get a behavior that special cases strings that are passed to ishandle.

Everything compiled and make check had no problem.

Given that I don't see any failures, does it make sense to also apply a changeset such as the one I've attached?

As my c++ skill is wanting, please review this proposal before committing.

Ben

Attachment: changeset-ishandle-vec.txt
Description: Text document





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]