Re: make check failure from current sources

[Jaroslav Hajek]

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Ben Abbott <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Oct 30, 2008, at 7:28 PM, Ben Abbott wrote:
>
>> I pulled this evening, my tip is
>>
>>> changeset:   8295:16819ca24fa5
>>> tag:         tip
>>> user:        John W. Eaton <address@hidden>
>>> date:        Thu Oct 30 18:03:37 2008 -0400
>>> summary:     fix typo in docs
>>
>> During my building went fine, but "make check" ...
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>  scripts/general/dblquad.m ..............................error: `pso'
>> undefined near line 248 column 23
>> error: evaluating argument list element number 1
>> error: called from:
>> error:   ./fntests.m at line -1, column -1
>>
>> make[2]: *** [check] Error 1
>> make[1]: *** [check] Error 2
>> make: *** [check] Error 2
>>
>> As the file dblquad.m only has 68 lines and does not contain the string
>> `pso', I'm at a loss.
>>
>> Anyone have an idea?
>>
>> Ben
>
> Running the first test of dblquad from the command line ...
>
> octave:1> assert (dblquad (@(x,y) 1 ./ (x+y), 0, 1, 0, 1), 2*log(2), 1e-6)
> error: A(I): Index exceeds matrix dimension.
> error: called from:
> error:
> /Users/bpabbott/Development/mercurial/octave-3.1.51/scripts/general/quadgk.m
> at line 374, column 7
> error:
> /Users/bpabbott/Development/mercurial/octave-3.1.51/scripts/general/dblquad.m
> at line 61, column 10
> error:    at line 54, column 26
> error:    at line 275, column 30
> error: evaluating argument list element number 1
> error:
> /Users/bpabbott/Development/mercurial/octave-3.1.51/scripts/general/quadgk.m
> at line 413, column 5
> error: `warn_state' undefined near line 374 column 19
> error: evaluating argument list element number 1
> error: called from:
> error:
> /Users/bpabbott/Development/mercurial/octave-3.1.51/scripts/general/quadgk.m
> at line 374, column 7
> error:
> /Users/bpabbott/Development/mercurial/octave-3.1.51/scripts/general/dblquad.m
> at line 54, column 5
> error: evaluating argument list element number 1
>
> Ben
>
>

Can anyone else reproduce this problem? It doesn't happen in my fresh
build. If not, could you please track the problem down a little?
There is no indexing operation on line 374 of quadgk. It would help if
you identified the exact inputs that cause quadgk to fail.

-- 
RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
computing expert
Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
Prague, Czech Republic
url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz