Re: New procedure bicgstab

[Jaroslav Hajek]

On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Søren Hauberg <address@hidden> wrote:
> man, 22 12 2008 kl. 11:05 +0100, skrev Jaroslav Hajek:
>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:14 AM, R! <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I understand that good preconditioning is very important for procedure like
>> > bicgstab and cgs which I wrote, so maybe I can now try to write ILU
>> > procedure for Octave if you find it useful.
>> >
>> > But I'm also interested in your opinion about bicgstab now.
>> >
>>
>> Certainly it's useful. Not even in the sparse world is every matrix
>> ill-conditioned.
>> The Krylov solvers are IMHO an important missing piece in Octave. It's
>> great someone took up the job. Even not-quite-optimized
>> implementations are a good take-off.
>> Having gmres would be great, too.
>
> Where should we put stuff like this? The 'optimization' package is
> option.
>

Radek's previous cgs contribution went into script/sparse/ and I guess it fits.


> Søren
>
>



-- 
RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
computing expert
Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
Prague, Czech Republic
url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz