Re: [RFC] External control of Octave via IPC

[Michael Goffioul]

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Søren Hauberg <address@hidden> wrote:
> I think we're misunderstanding each other. What I've done is very
> similar to the octave_server class that John has written. The, IMHO,
> problem with the octave_server class is that it is designed for
> interacting with editors that are running in the same process as Octave.
> I think that limits its usefulness, as many people (myself included)
> will prefer to run their favourite editor in a different process. The
> octave_server class will then not allow my editor to communicate with
> Octave, as they are not running in the same thread.

Now we understand each other :-)
I was pointing out the possible redundancy. But your solution being
more generic (because it allows inter-process interaction), I think
this is a good point.

Michael.