[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.0.5 ?
From: |
Thomas Weber |
Subject: |
Re: 3.0.5 ? |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:53:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 11:02:37AM +0200, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
> Well the fix is available in the archive, so anyone can download it to
> patch the sources. I have no problem with making a new release
> containing just this single bugfix, though I myself have no need for
> it. Should it be named 3.0.5, 3.0.4-1 or something like that? Or
> should we just re-release 3.0.4?
Please, never, ever re-release a tarball. This breaks all kind of
automatic version checkers, checksum testers and so on.
There's nothing wrong with a 3.0.5 tarball.
Thomas
- 3.0.5 ?, Carlo de Falco, 2009/04/07
- Re: 3.0.5 ?, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/04/07
- Message not available
- Re: 3.0.5 ?,
Thomas Weber <=
- Re: 3.0.5 ?, Rafael Laboissiere, 2009/04/08
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: 3.0.5 ?, Carlo de Falco, 2009/04/07