Re: MinGW build of 3.2.0: shared libstdc++

[Tatsuro MATSUOKA]

Hello

--- Benjamin Lindner  wrote:
> 
> True, I have a local changeset using the CXXLIBS flag. I hestitated to 
> submit it yet because obviously shared libstd++ on mingw is considered a 
> bit of a hack, and newer ports of TDM's gcc no longer include it, with a 
> remark of "problems". I haven't figured out what these "problems" are 
> though, and the octave builds work fine with it.
> 

If one would not care about of size, it can be used sever optimized option '-O3 
-fomoit-frame-pointer'
by GCC-4.3.3 which gives 20-30% faster octave.  The modification should not 
reject the GCC-4.3.3
building.

If the patch does not affect on GCC-4.3.3 building, I do not against the Alex's 
proposal.

Regards

Tatsuro 

--------------------------------------
Power up the Internet with Yahoo! Toolbar.
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/toolbar/