[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: changeset 9395 (3.2.x branch) should be applied not only x11 term bu
From: |
Tatsuro MATSUOKA |
Subject: |
Re: changeset 9395 (3.2.x branch) should be applied not only x11 term but on windows, wxt, ( and aqua) term |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Sep 2009 16:28:49 +0900 (JST) |
Sorry I have fogotten to attach a file.
Here I send it
Regards
Tatsuro
--- Tatsuro MATSUOKA <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hello
>
> --- Benjamin Lindner wrote:
>
> > Hmm, I tend to disagree.
> > With this patch we try fixing a hole in the cauldron by drilling
> > additional holes.
> >
> > I think it would be cleaner if the initial patch which supposedly fixes
> > some behaviour for x11 (and only x11?) is repaired so that it only
> > modifies behaviour for x11 and leaves the rest at status-quo.
> >
> > Is the undesired behaviour of the x11 reminal really caused by octave's
> > gnuplot backend? Or is it a gnuplot bug? If so, I think it would be
> > better to fix it in gnuplot.
>
>
>
> fplot ("cos", [0, 2*pi])
> drawnow("windows", "foo.txt", 9, "debug.txt")
>
> and see the debug.txt
> Expiations attachment file are
> debug_305.txt -- case octave 3.0.5/mingw
> debug_322.txt -- case octave 3.2.2/mingw
> debug_323_modifiedBenPatch.txt -- case octave 3.2.3/mingw with modified Ben's
> patch to windows
> terminal
>
> I add 'pause 2' to see like
> cat debug_305.txt | gnuplot
>
> For the case of debug_322.txt, screnn cleared and plot was carried out.
> The above is cause of flicking.
>
> This was caused by 'set multiplot;' at line 7 in debug_322.txt.
>
> This bug caused by octave but not by gnuplot!!
>
> Regards
>
> Tatsuro
>
> --------------------------------------
> Thanks 10 years! Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions
> http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/ec10years/
>
--------------------------------------
Thanks 10 years! Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/ec10years/
debug.txt.zip
Description: 2543241385-debug.txt.zip
- changeset 9395 (3.2.x branch) should be applied not only x11 term but on windows, wxt, ( and aqua) term, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2009/09/07
- Re: changeset 9395 (3.2.x branch) should be applied not only x11 term but on windows, wxt, ( and aqua) term, Benjamin Lindner, 2009/09/08
- Re: changeset 9395 (3.2.x branch) should be applied not only x11 term but on windows, wxt, ( and aqua) term, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2009/09/08
- Re: changeset 9395 (3.2.x branch) should be applied not only x11 term but on windows, wxt, ( and aqua) term, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2009/09/09
- Re: changeset 9395 (3.2.x branch) should be applied not only x11 term but on windows, wxt, ( and aqua) term, Ben Abbott, 2009/09/09
- Re: changeset 9395 (3.2.x branch) should be applied not only x11 term but on windows, wxt, ( and aqua) term, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2009/09/09
- Re: changeset 9395 (3.2.x branch) should be applied not only x11 term but on windows, wxt, ( and aqua) term, Ben Abbott, 2009/09/09
- Re: changeset 9395 (3.2.x branch) should be applied not only x11 term but on windows, wxt, ( and aqua) term, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2009/09/09
- Re: changeset 9395 (3.2.x branch) should be applied not only x11 term but on windows, wxt, ( and aqua) term, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2009/09/10
- Re: changeset 9395 (3.2.x branch) should be applied not only x11 term but on windows, wxt, ( and aqua) term, Ben Abbott, 2009/09/10
- Re: changeset 9395 (3.2.x branch) should be applied not only x11 term but on windows, wxt, ( and aqua) term, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2009/09/10
Re: changeset 9395 (3.2.x branch) should b e applied not only x11 term but on windows, wxt, ( a nd aqua) term, Ben Abbott, 2009/09/08