[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:57:13 -0500 |
On 18-Nov-2009, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
| > If we are narrowing to real based on the simple check of ip != 0, then
| > shouldn't this function also return true if the imaginary parts of all
| > elements are != 0 and ignore signbit? If so, then I think the only
| > place we would use lo_ieee_signbit is in printing values.
| >
|
| Yes, my patch changes these methods.
Thanks.
jwe
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, (continued)
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, John W. Eaton, 2009/11/17
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/18
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, Judd Storrs, 2009/11/18
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, John W. Eaton, 2009/11/18
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/18
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, Judd Storrs, 2009/11/18
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/18
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, John W. Eaton, 2009/11/18
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/18
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/18
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, John W. Eaton, 2009/11/12
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/13
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, Michael D. Godfrey, 2009/11/13
Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/13
RE: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, Schirmacher, Rolf, 2009/11/17