[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Matlab-style empty output/input arguments support
From: |
Jaroslav Hajek |
Subject: |
Re: Matlab-style empty output/input arguments support |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:44:48 +0100 |
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Judd Storrs <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Jaroslav Hajek <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> The problem with option 1 (shrinking the list) is that you wouldn't be
>> able to do things like
>> [d, ~, f] = [a, ~, c] = myfun (...)
>> with the obvious meaning (f would be undefined here).
>
> Under option 1, you would get the same effect by omitting the ~ on the
> last assignment. i.e. by doing this instead:
>
> [d, f] = [a, ~, c] = myfun ( ... )
>
Yes, I understand, but it just seems less intuitive to me.
--
RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek, PhD
computing expert & GNU Octave developer
Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
Prague, Czech Republic
url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz
Re: Matlab-style empty output/input arguments support, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/01/29
- Re: Matlab-style empty output/input arguments support, John W. Eaton, 2010/01/29
- Re: Matlab-style empty output/input arguments support, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/01/29
- Re: Matlab-style empty output/input arguments support, Søren Hauberg, 2010/01/29
- Re: Matlab-style empty output/input arguments support, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/01/29
- Re: Matlab-style empty output/input arguments support, John W. Eaton, 2010/01/29
Re: Matlab-style empty output/input arguments support, Michael D Godfrey, 2010/01/29
Re: Matlab-style empty output/input arguments support, Michael D Godfrey, 2010/01/29
Re: Matlab-style empty output/input arguments support, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/01/30