octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MNANCHK problem and solution proposal


From: Michael Goffioul
Subject: Re: MNANCHK problem and solution proposal
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 21:04:25 +0100

On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Jaroslav Hajek <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Michael Goffioul
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I came across a compilation problem under MSVC, which fails to
>> auto-detect the type of some template arguments. This can be
>> solved using the attached patch. Is this acceptable for including
>> into the main source tree, or should I keep it for myself?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
> I think this is OK, I've done such things before. This does not change
> the meaning of the code and does not obscure i, given that the
> parameter can be specified explicitly with little effort. I also
> assume that the explicit specs speed up compilation. Which is good :)

Here's the final changeset. I've included another explicit template
argument to prevent MSVC from complaining. Any objection?

Michael.

Attachment: octave_msvc.diff
Description: Binary data


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]