Re: fig2dev, pstoedit, epstool

octave-maintainers

From:	Michael D Godfrey
Subject:	Re: fig2dev, pstoedit, epstool
Date:	Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:42:54 -0700
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100921 Fedora/3.1.4-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.4

On 09/29/2010 11:23 AM, bpabbott wrote:

I've been wondering if tests should be made for gs, fig2dev, pstoedit, and epstool. Each of these are used to support the backends.

Thoughts?

Seems reasonable to me.

Michael

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: texi2dvi fails in faq, (continued)
- texi2dvi fails in faq, Michael D Godfrey, 2010/09/27
  - texi2dvi fails in faq, John W. Eaton, 2010/09/28
    - Re: texi2dvi fails in faq, Michael D Godfrey, 2010/09/28
    - Re: texi2dvi fails in faq, Michael D Godfrey, 2010/09/28
    - Re: texi2dvi fails in faq, Michael D Godfrey, 2010/09/29
    - Re: texi2dvi fails in faq, Michael D Godfrey, 2010/09/29
    - fig2dev, pstoedit, epstool, bpabbott, 2010/09/29
    - Re: fig2dev, pstoedit, epstool, Michael D Godfrey <=
    - Re: fig2dev, pstoedit, epstool, John W. Eaton, 2010/09/29
    - Re: texi2dvi fails in faq, John W. Eaton, 2010/09/29
    - Re: texi2dvi fails in faq, Michael D Godfrey, 2010/09/29