[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch for gamma test
|
From: |
Ben Abbott |
|
Subject: |
Re: patch for gamma test |
|
Date: |
Sat, 20 Nov 2010 18:28:27 -0500 |
On Nov 20, 2010, at 4:30 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> --- Mar 16/11/10, Ben Abbott <address@hidden> ha scritto:
>
>>
>> On Nov 16, 2010, at 10:35 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>>
>>> --- Mar 16/11/10, Ben Abbott ha scritto:
>>>
>>>> Data: Martedì 16 novembre 2010, 15:27
>>>> On Nov 16, 2010, at 5:03 AM, Marco
>>>> Atzeri wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> As discussed on
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/2010-October/017501.html
>>>>>
>>>>> this changeset amend the expectation from
>>>>>
>>>>> gamma(-1)= NaN
>>>>> to
>>>>> gamma(-1)= Inf
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Marco
>>>>>
>>>>> <gamma.patch>
>>>>
>>>> Matlab agrees that gamma(-1) is Inf, not NaN.
>>>>
>>>> Octave gives NaN for me. Should the sources
>> be fixed
>>>> to return the proper result?
>>>>
>>>> Ben
>>>>
>>>
>>> I presume it is system dependent.
>>> On cygwin gamma(-1)= Inf
>>>
>>> which system are you running ?
>>>
>>> Marco
>>
>> I'm running MacOS 10.6.5.
>>
>> Ben
>>
>
> Could you check if this patch solve the discrepancy ?
>
> Marco
>
> <gamma_2.patch>
Works for me on Ubuntu 10.04. I hope to check on MacOS 10.6.5 in a few hrs.
Ben