[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GotoBLAS2 license
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: GotoBLAS2 license |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:31:45 -0500 |
On 24-Nov-2010, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
| On 24 November 2010 19:04, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
| > On 25-Nov-2010, Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
| >
| > | Kazushige Goto said "Please use the MKL or ACML".
| >
| > Are the sources for these libraries available under terms that are
| > compatible with the GPL?
|
| No, they both have EULAs. And no source. And claim to be patented,
| copyrighted, trademarked, trade secreted, ad nauseum.
Then I would say "Please don't use the MKL or ACML", or "Why would you
want to use software with a license like that?"
jwe
- Re: GotoBLAS2 license, (continued)
- Re: GotoBLAS2 license, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/11/23
- Re: GotoBLAS2 license, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2010/11/23
- Re: GotoBLAS2 license, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2010/11/23
- Re: GotoBLAS2 license, Thomas Weber, 2010/11/23
- Re: GotoBLAS2 license, Marco Atzeri, 2010/11/24
- Re: GotoBLAS2 license, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2010/11/24
- Re: GotoBLAS2 license, Fredrik Lingvall, 2010/11/24
- Re: GotoBLAS2 license, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2010/11/24
- Re: GotoBLAS2 license, John W. Eaton, 2010/11/24
- Re: GotoBLAS2 license, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2010/11/24
- Re: GotoBLAS2 license,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: GotoBLAS2 license, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2010/11/24
- Re: GotoBLAS2 license, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/11/27
- Re: GotoBLAS2 license, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2010/11/24