[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Axes Ticks Positioning in 3D plots (FLTK)
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: Axes Ticks Positioning in 3D plots (FLTK) |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:27:00 -0500 |
On 10-Jan-2011, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
| What really worries me is that people might complain about things like
| QtOctave not looking exactly like Matab's own interface, hence not
| compatible.
|
| Would that happen frequently?
I don't really care where the tick marks appear, top or bottom, but
I'd bet that yes, some people will complain about it not being exactly
like Matlab. I mean, people complain about the most ridiculous things
all the time, don't they? Why would this be different?
jwe
- Re: Axes Ticks Positioning in 3D plots (FLTK), (continued)
- Re: Axes Ticks Positioning in 3D plots (FLTK), Ben Abbott, 2011/01/09
- Re: Axes Ticks Positioning in 3D plots (FLTK), Ben Abbott, 2011/01/09
- Re: Axes Ticks Positioning in 3D plots (FLTK), Ben Abbott, 2011/01/09
- Re: Axes Ticks Positioning in 3D plots (FLTK), Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/01/09
- Re: Axes Ticks Positioning in 3D plots (FLTK), Michael D Godfrey, 2011/01/09
- Re: Axes Ticks Positioning in 3D plots (FLTK), logari81, 2011/01/10
- Re: Axes Ticks Positioning in 3D plots (FLTK), John W. Eaton, 2011/01/10
Re: Axes Ticks Positioning in 3D plots (FLTK), Michael Goffioul, 2011/01/10
Re: Axes Ticks Positioning in 3D plots (FLTK), John W. Eaton, 2011/01/10