[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [POSSIBLE VIRUS:###] gl2ps bug?
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: [POSSIBLE VIRUS:###] gl2ps bug? |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:02:54 -0500 |
On Sep 15, 2011, at 8:16 PM, Michael Godfrey wrote:
>> I looked quickly at this patch. It seems to have many changes
>> whose effect is nothing. i.e. a line is replaced by an identical
>> line. Is it possible that there was an error in building the
>> patch? Some changes were also introduced, but it is hard to
>> isolate them from the "do nothing" changes. In any case, it would
>> seem good to back it out until the problem can be isolated and a
>> patch which only makes changes can be generated.
On 15 September 2011 19:59, Ben Abbott <address@hidden> wrote:
> I agree. There are a lot of changes that appear to be "do nothing".
> Does anyone know why "hg diff" is detecting a change where there
> appears to be none?
It's whitespace. Do "hg diff -w" to omit whitespace changes.
- Jordi G. H.
- Re: [POSSIBLE VIRUS:###] gl2ps bug?, Michael Godfrey, 2011/09/15
- Re: [POSSIBLE VIRUS:###] gl2ps bug?, Ben Abbott, 2011/09/15
- Re: [POSSIBLE VIRUS:###] gl2ps bug?, Ben Abbott, 2011/09/15
- Re: [POSSIBLE VIRUS:###] gl2ps bug?,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=
- Re: [POSSIBLE VIRUS:###] gl2ps bug?, Ben Abbott, 2011/09/15
- Re: [POSSIBLE VIRUS:###] gl2ps bug?, Michael D Godfrey, 2011/09/15
- Re: [POSSIBLE VIRUS:###] gl2ps bug?, Michael Goffioul, 2011/09/16
- Re: [POSSIBLE VIRUS:###] gl2ps bug?, Ben Abbott, 2011/09/16
- Re: [POSSIBLE VIRUS:###] gl2ps bug?, Ben Abbott, 2011/09/16
- Re: [POSSIBLE VIRUS:###] gl2ps bug?, Michael D. Godfrey, 2011/09/15