octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Stable vs. Default branch

From: Michael D Godfrey
Subject: Re: Stable vs. Default branch
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 11:04:20 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110906 Thunderbird/6.0.2
On 10/03/2011 09:05 AM, Rik wrote: 
 Alternatively, we keep all development on the
default branch and only do the merge right before preparing 3.6 release
candidates.

--Rik
This seems preferable to me.  This would allow, if necessary,
an "incremental" update of the current release without any extra
effort.  It is convenient to have a branch of the current release just
in case...

Michael
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]