[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proposal for new m-file function
From: |
Martin Helm |
Subject: |
Re: proposal for new m-file function |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:00:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0 |
Am 26.03.2012 15:53, schrieb c.:
> On 26 Mar 2012, at 15:23, Ben Abbott wrote:
>
>> I've replied and mentioned our concerns about the terms of use, and linked
>> to the parts that are worrisome for us.
> As far as I understand if he could just send the file via email to the list
> it would be OK for us to use it, right?
> c.
That is how I understand it as well, it would solve any problem with the
MC restriction getting it directly from the author.
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, (continued)
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Martin Helm, 2012/03/22
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Ben Abbott, 2012/03/22
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Ben Abbott, 2012/03/23
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Martin Helm, 2012/03/23
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Ben Abbott, 2012/03/24
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Ben Abbott, 2012/03/25
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2012/03/26
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, c., 2012/03/26
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Ben Abbott, 2012/03/26
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, c., 2012/03/26
- Re: proposal for new m-file function,
Martin Helm <=
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Ben Abbott, 2012/03/26
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Ben Abbott, 2012/03/27
- Re: proposal for new m-file function, Ben Abbott, 2012/03/29