[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
.h.in vs .in.h
|
From: |
John W. Eaton |
|
Subject: |
.h.in vs .in.h |
|
Date: |
Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:05:50 -0400 |
In Octave we have some .h and .cc files that are generated from .h.in
and .cc.in files. This naming scheme causes trouble if you are trying
to grep for all occurrences of some string in all .h files. To solve
this problem, gnulib uses .in.h instead. Is there any objection to
renaming the .h.in and .cc.in files to be .in.h and .in.cc instead?
jwe
- .h.in vs .in.h,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Júlio Hoffimann, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Michael Goffioul, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Júlio Hoffimann, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Júlio Hoffimann, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11