[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: java package
From: |
Michael Goffioul |
Subject: |
Re: java package |
Date: |
Wed, 9 May 2012 18:50:43 +0100 |
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 6:38 PM, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 9-May-2012, Michael Goffioul wrote:
> | Those users might also expect that something like this is working:
> |
> | import java.util.*
> | l = ArrayList();
> |
> | but it's not.
>
> But some things do work, right? So I think it is still a useful thing
> to add to the core distribution.
Yes, of course. I'm not arguing against including the code. I'm just
mentioning limitation that you or other people might not be aware of.
The limitation I'm mentioning above is pretty "visible" as it affects
the first thing you'd want to do with the java package: creating an
object or calling a static method (you have to use java_new or
java_invoke functions instead).
Michael.
- java package, John W. Eaton, 2012/05/09
- Re: java package, Alexander Hansen, 2012/05/09
- Re: java package, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/05/09
- Re: java package, John W. Eaton, 2012/05/09
- Re: java package, Luke M, 2012/05/09
- Re: java package, Carnë Draug, 2012/05/09
- Re: java package, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/05/09
- Re: java package, John W. Eaton, 2012/05/09
- Re: java package, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/05/09
- Re: java package, Júlio Hoffimann, 2012/05/09
- Re: java package, Robert T. Short, 2012/05/09
- Re: java package, John W. Eaton, 2012/05/09
- Re: java package, Michael D Godfrey, 2012/05/09