[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patches to build with clang was Re: Autoload not effective.
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: patches to build with clang was Re: Autoload not effective. |
Date: |
Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:22:08 -0400 |
On 1 June 2012 12:01, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 1-Jun-2012, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
> | On 6/1/12 7:04 AM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> |
> | <snip>
> |
> | >> I use clang to compile the C/C++ parts of Octave on Mac OS 10.7 for
> | >> Fink, albeit with some patching. It might be that Brandon needs to
> | >> apply the same patches.
> | >
> | > And you should send us those patches too. :-)
> | >
> | > - Jordi G. H.
> |
> | (Switching to octave-maintainers)
> |
> | Easy enough. I've attached a diff against the default branch.
>
> I'm unlikely to apply these changes unless I know what problems they
> solve. What error messages do you see without the changes?
I can imagine why std::size_t might be correct, but I don't see why
clang doesn't like those static keywords. What is the error it outputs
with them?
- Jordi G. H.