octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: patches to build with clang was Re: Autoload not effective.


From: Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
Subject: Re: patches to build with clang was Re: Autoload not effective.
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:22:08 -0400

On 1 June 2012 12:01, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> On  1-Jun-2012, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
> | On 6/1/12 7:04 AM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> |
> | <snip>
> |
> | >> I use clang to compile the C/C++ parts of Octave on Mac OS 10.7 for
> | >> Fink, albeit with some patching. It might be that Brandon needs to
> | >> apply the same patches.
> | >
> | > And you should send us those patches too. :-)
> | >
> | > - Jordi G. H.
> |
> | (Switching to octave-maintainers)
> |
> | Easy enough.  I've attached a diff against the default branch.
>
> I'm unlikely to apply these changes unless I know what problems they
> solve.  What error messages do you see without the changes?

I can imagine why std::size_t might be correct, but I don't see why
clang doesn't like those static keywords. What is the error it outputs
with them?

- Jordi G. H.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]