|
From: | Daniel J Sebald |
Subject: | Re: Build warnings for documentation |
Date: | Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:12:58 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 |
On 08/23/2012 05:46 PM, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
On 08/23/2012 05:31 PM, Daniel J Sebald wrote:On 08/23/2012 05:21 PM, Rik wrote:What commands does make execute and do they succeed?[interpreter]# make plot.txt ../../run-octave -f -q -H -p ../../../octave/doc/interpreter --eval "plotimages ('plot', 'txt');" is what I see....and the "plot.txt" file is then present.
The other files plot.eps, hist.eps, etc. are present. Well hist.txt -> PLOTIMAGES_TXT -> IMAGES_TXT -> octave.info: $(IMAGES_TXT) Is octave.info not being built somehow? I do
make octave.info
and a whole host of *.txt files are generated. Hmm, this looks strange: [interpreter]# grep "octave.info" * [snip] Makefile:INFO_DEPS = $(srcdir)/octave.info Makefile:infofile = $(infodir)/octave.infoMakefile:$(srcdir)/octave.info: octave.texi $(srcdir)/version.texi $(octave_TEXINFOS)
[snip]Two different parent directory definitions. With the rearranged source code, is either "srcdir" or "infodir" no longer correct?
Dan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |